Showing posts with label Flickr. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Flickr. Show all posts

Friday, 27 November 2009

Flickr



Started a Flickr account to house my illustrations and the odd gif that I'll be creating. Don't know why it took me so long, I've always had complaints about blogger and photobucket being shit and resizing or compressing my images, but whatevs.

File under: tablet has changed my life.

Monday, 2 March 2009

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

Wikipedia Loves Art at the V&A

This February Wikipedia is loving art at the Victoria and Albert museum here in London! A fun opportunity to finally make that contribution to everyone's favorite wiki and take part in a large scale free culture/open media event.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WLA@V%26A

Tuesday, 16 September 2008

Belize Larval Fish Group






An awesome collection of high quality digital photos of the fish of Belize taken by the Division of Fishes at the Smithsonian Institute has recently been uploaded to their Flickr site. The Belize Larval Fish Group photo set, so far, has 44 images that help make up a larger collection that will be on display at the Smithsonian later this month.

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

I had a dream last night ...

I had a dream last night and Trent Reznor was in it, then I woke up and looked over my regular links and saw this image on Bezembinder's Illustrated Links:


It is by Russian artist/designer Protey Temen who's work looks to explore "different ways of visual environment saturation."


Although I appreciate his illustrations (and especially the above portrait) what really grabs me are his photo/image interventions.



A really great way to understand and know how to work with space is by filling it all up. It forces you to pay attention to the negative spaces that are often ignored, even though they are as important as (if not more than) the main subject matter of an image.

Wednesday, 13 August 2008

Copyright lasts ... FOREVERRRR!!!

An interesting discussion is going on on Flickr about copyright law after a member of the 100 Years Old community had a problem while (not?) scanning family photos (that were over 100 years old) at a Wal-Mart in the US. Apparently copyright lasts forever!

It's an interesting discussion personally — considering my interest in old photography — and politically (for the online community) — considering Flickr's licensing options and the possible resulting problems. I'm all for fair use and creative commons, but I also understand how having images of friends and family used freely by others can be a bit disconcerting for some. Really it's about giving credit where credit is due.

But what do you do when the image's source is untraceable? The internet is full of images and bits of text that just float around (like many of the cat GIF memes I posted a few days ago), do they just become products of the internet, destined to wander around freely coming and going as they please like digital nomads? Meh ... something to think about, although I'm sure it's been discussed before.

Via BoingBoing.

Saturday, 26 July 2008

George Eastman House


George Eastman House photostream on Flickr.

George Eastman House, an independent nonprofit museum, is an educational institution that tells the story of photography and motion pictures—media that have changed and continue to change our perception of the world. (From the Profile)

Wednesday, 11 June 2008

Black and White

I've always enjoyed going through my dad's old photos from when he was a young man in the 50s, along with the large collection of his cartoons documenting the family's life from as far back as the 60s (when my older half-sister was born), but it wasn't until my mother inherited a box of even older photos from her mother that I began to fixate on antique photos (I hesitate to use the word vintage, it can be - and is - applied to so much now that it's lost a lot of meaning to me). Not the process - I never went for photography in school - but the aesthetic, which greatly inspired me during my last year at uni.



Now, I haven't done much work since I left Montreal, my current apartment is tiny and London rent is too high for me to rent anything beyond a home, and I've given myself the excuse that as long as I'm studying something art related it's ok if I don't pick up a pencil or brush ... for the time being, anyway. What I do try to do, however, is I keep my eyes open for old photos (and as time goes on, I find myself attracted to contemporary photography with a similar aesthetic, but I won't be getting into that here, at least not now), either on the web, or IRL (Thursday antiques market is a treasure trove).

One site that has a great selection of high quality images is Shorpy Photoblog. Their images are mostly from the 20s and 30s and they're mostly professional images of such good quality that they at times look contemporary.


Another good source is Flickr. I learned about The Library of Congress' photostream through a friend's blog. The National Library of Congress is the US national library (based in Washington, DC), and are sharing their images through Flickr to make their images more accessible to the public. Their images vary much more in quality (though the digital copies are top notch) and often have crop marks or captions, which add to the aesthetic IMO.



The aesthetic I keep referring to is the lack of clarity, the haziness, that occurs physically through the older photo processes and psychologically thanks to the effect photography has on our memory. Even though we have no memories of these older images, we look at them as a record of a moment and compare them to our own photos of our own memories. These older photos belong to someone else's memories and I, anyway, can't help but try to recreate it in my own mind - reality doesn't look like this to me, so what would it have looked like really? The uncertainty of old photographs, I believe, tap into our sense of the sublime - that part of our aesthetic sense that has to grasp something conceptually that we know we can never fully grasp - and the pleasure we get in the unknown.

An interesting net toy is the Vintage Photo Converter. This Japanese application lets you upload your photos and then "converts" them into an image that looks like it's "over 100 to 150 years old." It's actually quite fun to experiment with because the effect isn't bad at all. As a result you realize what makes an old photo isn't just the effect but the composition, poses, props, etc.


You can use it to play with that expectation of memory and understanding of what a contemporary photograph should look like. But there are many other better or more interesting ways of getting a similar effect, such as using an old camera, a polaroid, a lomo, playing with image copying (which degrades the image quality), etc. I could go on and on, but then the post will grow into something else, and nobody will ever want to navigate through it all. Besides, the more I hold back the more posts I'll have for the future!